AI Workflow Pilot
Build a small AI-assisted workflow, check it against real examples and give your team the prompts, configuration and operating guide.
£995 one-off

Test one useful AI task in your business.
Teams with one clear use case, such as classifying enquiries, summarising approved documents or preparing a first draft for human review.
One AI task inside one workflow with up to three action steps.
Up to two tools connected through supported connectors.
One selected AI model or service and documented reasons for the choice.
Up to ten representative evaluation cases, including failures and escalation.
Human review before external or consequential actions, usage limits and failure notification.
One revision, a handover session and a review two weeks after agreed launch.
We agree the task, examples, cost limit and success checks. You review a test version before launch. Target: one to two working weeks once scope, access and examples are ready.
A tested pilot, editable prompts and configuration, evaluation results and an operating guide. You can decide whether to expand based on measured results.
£995 one-off for the starter scope. 50% at booking and 50% after the acceptance demonstration, before final handover. Model usage and software subscriptions are separate.
Custom models, large document libraries, bespoke integrations and autonomous regulated decisions are outside the starter. A normal handover is included; there is no need to buy AI Handover as an extra.
Start with a short fit call. We confirm the scope, total price, access needed and delivery dates in writing before work begins. Prices are in GBP, excluding VAT where applicable. Software subscriptions, hosting and AI usage are separate and disclosed before you commit. A Hub subscription is only needed if it is the platform you choose. Ongoing support is optional.
You keep the agreed deliverables and editable documentation. Bespoke code transfers after payment, subject to third-party licences; existing platforms remain licensed. We explain any limitations on export or moving providers. Results depend on the process and how the tools are used; no particular savings are guaranteed.
Builds include 30 days of fixes for defects against the agreed scope from handover. New features, third-party outages and platform changes are separate from that cover.
Reduce repetitive tasks and unnecessary paperwork, freeing your team to focus on what matters.
Simplify business processes, remove bottlenecks and help work move smoothly across your organisation.
Make your existing tools work together, reducing duplicated effort and keeping information connected.
Turn business information into clear reports and useful insights so you can act with confidence.
Improve enquiries, bookings, onboarding and follow-ups to create a smoother journey for your customers.
Get practical outsourcing and operational support without the commitment of hiring additional staff.
Define one task and describe how a person decides whether its output is acceptable. Bring representative examples, including cases that should be rejected, escalated or handled manually. Approved inputs and clear expected results are more useful than a large, unreviewed collection of documents with no agreed purpose.
Identify the workflow owner, the tools involved and the cost limit to discuss during scoping. Decide where human review belongs before an external or consequential action. The starter is a bounded pilot for learning about a task in practice, so it needs an evaluation question as well as a technical connection between tools.
An illustrative pilot might classify an incoming enquiry and prepare a draft for a colleague. The selected model performs the agreed task, but a person reviews the result before it produces an external or consequential action. Cases outside the expected pattern should have an escalation route rather than be treated as a confident answer.
Use the evaluation cases to inspect both useful outputs and failures. A short, plausible draft may still omit a required fact or use the wrong category. Reviewing those outcomes against the agreed success checks helps the team decide whether the pilot is ready for its limited use and which assumptions need further work.
Keep the prompts, configuration and evaluation results together. When a prompt or input changes, the existing examples provide a starting point for checking what has improved and what may have become less reliable. The operating guide should remain useful to the person who reviews results and handles notifications.
The included review two weeks after agreed launch provides a point to discuss the pilot against the chosen measures. Expansion is a separate decision, not an automatic part of the starter. A normal handover is already included, so you do not need to purchase AI Handover simply to understand a new Labs pilot.
Build a small AI-assisted workflow, check it against real examples and give your team the prompts, configuration and operating guide.
£995 one-off
One AI task in one workflow with up to three action steps, two supported tools and one selected model or service. The published scope also includes evaluation cases, human review, usage limits, a revision and handover.
Human review is included before external or consequential actions. Autonomous regulated decisions are outside the starter scope. The task and escalation route are agreed before launch.
You agree examples, a cost limit and success checks, then review a test version. Up to ten representative evaluation cases include failures and escalation; the results inform whether to expand.
No. Model usage and software subscriptions are separate. The starter price is £995 one-off, excluding VAT where applicable, with 50% at booking and 50% after acceptance before handover.
No. A normal handover is included in new Labs builds and pilots. AI Handover is for an existing workflow whose knowledge needs to be brought in-house.
The scope includes a review two weeks after agreed launch. Major expansion, custom models, large document libraries and bespoke integrations need a separate scope.